[Vince]

@Doug it’s always interesting to see someone else use Revu – even if they have only been doing this for five minutes. I guess most of us are self-taught and, unless someone shows us a different way or questions what we are doing, we just carry on in our old ways.

I hadn’t thought or looked at this but fortunately my custom tools are all created using the perimeter tool as I often use the click and drag method for measuring the foundations of houses. Measuring say 200 plots without this would take considerably longer.

I guess the issue with the polylength would be that it needs two distinct ends in order to offer the facility of adding the rise / drop measurements as well.

[Vince]

Hi @robgib0

I’ve given up trying to use sets with UK drawings.

It’s not only the location of the title block that has caused me problems but also the

– drawing titles

– how the revision letter or number is added

I’ve tried about 30 sets of drawings now and reckon that the automatically uploading of details is probably only somewhere between 10-20% accurate at best.

That just leaves entering most of the details manually which really isn’t an option when you are looking at hundreds of drawings.

[Vince]

@mikeceilingsystems-com are you trying to just work out the ’rounded up’ overall area or the actual number of whole tiles?

If you are just wanting to look at the overall area then I think you may be able to use the properties to adjust the document (shape) width and height.

You’ll have to work out the dimensions with them being adjust for the scale of the drawing but this doesn’t appear to be too much of a problem in metric so I guess it will be the same as imperial.

If you are looking at the number of tiles then, I think the discussion that @David Cutler mentioned might help. I’m thinking that there may even be a way to automatically count the number of whole tiles without adjusting the original shape using the Spaces method.

[Vince]

@David Cutler how about naming your parent layer “aaa Takeoff” (or starting any title with “aaa “) and then ensuring that “Sort Layers Alpabetically” is turned on?

Then that way it might not be necessary to drag to the top? 😀

[Vince]

Thanks @David Cutler !

[Vince]

Definitely of equal importance @David Cutler !

With regards the nickname, I think I’ll go with “hyperlink” as you take instantly take us where we need to go! 😀

[Vince]

Hi @David Cutler , I was going to join the webcast but unfortunately was out all day yesterday – I missed MCR too!!!

The points that you have made are all applicable here too along with a few others: –

1. Designers should be made to check the scales on their drawings again before issuing. I would estimate that 20-30% of the site layouts I see have the wrong scale in the title block.

2. As you have noted before, scale bars should be included on all drawings. I am fed up with having to calibrate a drawing using a ‘standard’ road width or parking bay. As with my first point though, these need checking before issuing as I recently have found some of these to be wrong.

3. Revisions should always be clouded if a comment such as “Amended to client’s requirements” is going to be used in the title block.

Obviously, we have the major issue here of how drawings are named, etc so I won’t go into that again.

Another regular thing I come across is where a site layout is split over multiple drawings. It is obvious that there are master layouts but trying to get an engineer to issue these can be a nightmare.

We’ve even had engineers refusing to issue the .dwg drawings on a contract that we’ve won – even though we needed them for uploading for setting out purposes.

With regards your point about not being able to turn layers on and off, a drawing with too much data on it can be just as useless as one with too little.

What really confuses me is that the client has paid for the drawings so surely it should be up to them which drawings are issued and to what quality.

And that is my rant over too. 🙄

[Vince]

I had to look that one up @David Cutler ! 😅

I’m just concerned how Revu will deal with things when revised drawings are added.

[Vince]

Hi @Doug – the problem I have is that I am generally looking at a minimum of 100 drawings in a set and the Automark doesn’t work on the vast majority. This just makes labelling drawings individually too time consuming.

I’m always open to looking at new ways of doing things though – so will try again when I get five minutes.

[Vince]

Thanks @lizlarsen ! I think I’m going to play it safe on this one and get the users to ‘import’ just in case anything goes wrong. They can all be emailed if there is a change to the tools, custom columns, etc..

[Vince]

Hi @lizlarsen – one quick question – if the ‘add’ method is used will the root file be updated every time any user saves the profile?

[Vince]

Thanks @lizlarsen – that is really helpful!

[Vince]

Many thanks @troy-degroot !

[Vince]

@David Cutler don’t forget – save your new layer configuration in order so you don’t have to repeat everything the next time you open the drawing.

[Vince]

I’m not sure which is more accurate: –

David ‘Bookmark’ Culter

Or

David ‘Hyperlink’ Cutler

😄